The Edgework model · contract value

Contract Surplus

What does the model think each contract is worth? Expected cost is fit within position from a player's even-strength zone-rate value, then compared to his actual cap hit. Positive surplus is a team-friendly deal; negative is an overpay — but it's a 5v5-value estimate, so power-play drivers carry a caveat.

Estimated surplus vs 5×5 even-strength value — a model estimate, not a verdict. Expected cost is a within-position fit on each player’s 5v5 zone-rate value; it does not credit power-play or penalty-kill production. A special-teams driver (marked ⓘ PP-heavy) can read as an “overpay” here while still earning his deal. How surplus is computed.
2026-27 contracts · as of 2026-06-25 · 189 overpays · 66 headline bargains · 109 panel players unsigned (no contract to value)

The bargain board floors at AAV ≥ $1.5M and value ≥ 0.25 SD above positional average: the cost curve is roughly linear, so cheap depth and minimum-salary deals otherwise read as the biggest “bargains” (a model-floor artifact). Those deals are excluded from this board, not hidden — the regression still fits on every contract and each player keeps his computed surplus on his own page. Overpays are unfloored.