The Edgework model · honesty surface

How Calibrated Is It?

A forecast is only as good as its calibration: when it says 70%, does it happen 70% of the time? Here is the reliability curve from a held-out backtest — shown straight, including where the model is over-confident.

320
Calls (team × snapshot)
0.4372
Log-loss
vs 0.693 coin-flip
0.1484
Brier
vs 0.25 coin-flip
predicted P(make playoffs)observed rate
Dashed = perfect calibration. Point size ∝ sample. Orange = over-confident.
Over-confident band: 0.50.8
In this range the model says “likely” but reality is closer to a toss-up — its discrimination is modest, so its confident-middle calls are softer than stated. We show this rather than smooth it over.

FC-C.1 snapshot backtest (n=320). Well-calibrated at the extremes; MILD OVER-CONFIDENCE in the 0.6-0.8 band — disclosed, recal deferred until 2026-27 makes it 3 seasons.

PredictednObservedGap
0.00.1600.067-0.034
0.10.2230.261-0.114
0.20.3370.297-0.048
0.30.4240.417-0.070
0.40.5230.435+0.014
0.50.6160.438+0.107
0.60.7210.476+0.179
0.70.8190.474+0.270
0.80.9330.879-0.033
0.91.0641.000-0.028