98
2025–26 · player profile
Mikhail
Sergachev.
UTA· D· Shoots L· 6'3" / 212 lbs· Age 28· Nizhnekamsk, RUS
GP
78
G
10
A
49
PTS
59
+/–
+2
TOI/GP
—
Value Model
Edgework action value · 2025–26Methodology
Estimated surplus vs 5×5 even-strength value — a model estimate, not a verdict. Expected cost is a within-position fit on each player’s 5v5 zone-rate value; it does not credit power-play or penalty-kill production. A special-teams driver (marked ⓘ PP-heavy) can read as an “overpay” here while still earning his deal. How surplus is computed.
Contract Surplus
−$2.8Mⓘ PP-heavy
model expects $5.7M vs $8.5M AAV — a 5v5-value estimate, not a verdict
Net contribution
-0.25
#68 of 108 defensemen
5v5 zone-rate vs position peers
Season impact
+16.1
#27 of 108 defensemen
total action value, all strengths
Offensive contribution
0.37
#44 of 108 defensemen
Defensive contribution
0.04
#78 of 108 defensemen
Shooting
0.21
Playmaking
0.18
Shot-blocking
0.18
RAPM net · 3-yr
+0.09
NHL Edge Percentiles
Top Shot Speedshooting
96
99.0 mph
Top Skating Speedskating
98
23.84 mph
20+ mph Burstsskating
67
87
Total Distance Skatedskating
94
257.3 mi
Max Distance / Gameskating
75
3.84 mi
Shots on Goalshooting
93
159
Offensive Zone Time %possession
78
43.8%
Shot Locations
shots on goal · season to date
low volhigh vol
Top zones
Center Point5299p
L Point2790p
Beyond Red Line17100p
Outside L1391p
High Slot1290p
R Circle1188p
cell value = shots · color = league %ile
Last Five
game log
| Date | Opp | Res | G | A | P | SOG | TOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1 | vs VGK | L 1–5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 22:28 |
| Apr 29 | @ VGK | L 4–5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 37:35 |
| Apr 27 | vs VGK | L 4–5 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 30:32 |
| Apr 24 | vs VGK | W 4–2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24:25 |
| Apr 21 | @ VGK | W 3–2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 25:02 |
Career by Season
NHL regular season
| Season | Team | GP | G | A | P | +/– | TOI/GP | S% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | Mammoth | 78 | 10 | 49 | 59 | +2 | 24:18 | 6.3% |
| 2024–25 | Utah Hockey Club | 77 | 15 | 38 | 53 | -8 | 25:07 | 11.4% |
| 2023–24 | Lightning | 34 | 2 | 17 | 19 | -16 | 22:33 | 3.8% |
| 2022–23 | Lightning | 79 | 10 | 54 | 64 | +13 | 23:49 | 6.4% |
| 2021–22 | Lightning | 78 | 7 | 31 | 38 | +6 | 22:28 | 4.7% |
| 2020–21 | Lightning | 56 | 4 | 26 | 30 | +5 | 21:58 | 3.7% |
| 2019–20 | Lightning | 70 | 10 | 24 | 34 | +15 | 20:22 | 8.5% |
| 2018–19 | Lightning | 75 | 6 | 26 | 32 | +12 | 17:55 | 4.7% |
| 2017–18 | Lightning | 79 | 9 | 31 | 40 | +11 | 15:22 | 6.4% |
| 2016–17 | Canadiens | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | 12:08 | 0.0% |
Common linemates
UTA · top defensemen by points
proxy · team scoring leaders, not tracked line-combination data
Data · NHL EDGE · contracts: see /data/contracts.json
EDGE data refreshed recentlyCached · 12 hours